Monday, February 4, 2013

Alert from Wisconsin Department of Financial Intitutions Part 2

By Neil L. Wojtal

Here is a copy of the letter and form which has been sent to Wisconsin businesses. Our firm received the form in the weekend mail. This form is not from the state of Wisconsin and you will receive nothing for your $125 other than information that is readily available on the DFI website. Do not fill out this form and return it. Save your money.





The information contained in this document is intended for the sole purpose of providing general legal information and is not intended as legal advice of any kind. This information may not apply to your specific issue, therefore, do not act upon this information without consulting Zimmerman & Steber Legal Group, S. C. or another qualified attorney.


Friday, February 1, 2013

Alert from Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions


I received the following alert from the state of Wisconsin. Do not get caught in this scam. Call the DFI if you are contacted by this company.

Neil L. Wojtal

January 30, 2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: George Althoff, Communications Director, 608-261-4504
State businesses cautioned about
company’s request for information

MADISON – The Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) is urging Wisconsin business
owners to exercise caution if they receive a request for information from a company called
Corporate Records Service. Business owners are asked to fill out an Annual Minutes Form and
submit a fee of $125 to a Madison mail box. Businesses are not required by DFI or any other state agency to complete the form.

“The form has a very official look to it,” said Paul Holzem, Administrator of DFI’s Division of
Corporate and Consumer Services. “It includes information about companies that is available on the DFI website, such as corporation number and incorporation date, that make it appear to be a legitimate request. Business owners should not be hoodwinked into giving out potentially confidential information and paying an unnecessary fee. ”

DFI has received numerous inquiries from business owners asking whether the form was a new requirement from DFI, which is the filing office for Wisconsin businesses.
The form states that Corporate Records Service is offering to assist businesses with maintaining minutes of meetings of shareholders and boards of directors, but does not include any specifics on how the company will supply that service. The form also includes the following statement:

“Corporate Records Service is not a government agency and does not have or contract with any government agency to provide this service. ”

“Any business that chooses to fill out the form and pay the fee should make sure they will be
getting some legitimate service in return,” Holzem said.

Corporate Records Service is not registered with DFI. State officials in Maine, Indiana and
Tennessee also have warned businesses in their states about the activities of Corporate Records Service.

Business owners who have questions about the form may contact DFI at 608-266-1622.
 
The information contained in this document is intended for the sole purpose of providing general legal information and is not intended as legal advice of any kind. This information may not apply to your specific issue, therefore, do not act upon this information without consulting Zimmerman & Steber Legal Group, S. C. or another qualified attorney.

Monday, January 7, 2013

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012

I received this newsletter from Shakespeare Wealth Management, Inc. I thought I would pass it along since it contains a good synopsis of the recent legislation passed by Congress to prevent the tax increases included in the fiscal cliff legislation.

Here is the link:
 http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=hsku6heab&v=001zsj4A0_3E1HbyYFUIxNEbWcIfDGW1qKOnCpztf7LLZMU4Hc1Rr_eDXyFczokaOqzReSadSYljKYvTU6XMb2WNW0WnQffYOh5evOIlXjxAWY%3D


The information contained in this document is intended for the sole purpose of providing general legal information and is not intended as legal advice of any kind. This information may not apply to your specific issue, therefore, do not act upon this information without consulting Zimmerman & Steber Legal Group, S. C. or another qualified attorney.


Wednesday, November 28, 2012

The Hiring Process

I ran across this article on Linkedin. I thought I would pass it along. Our business clients should read the article and then think about their own hiring process. Does your hiring process cover the points raised in the article? If not, you may want to rethink your process.

http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20121126061916-15454-thinking-backwards-will-help-you-improve-every-hiring-decision

Neil

Monday, September 10, 2012

Four Plans That Every Small Business Person Needs


By: Neil L. Wojtal

When a small business owner thinks about his/her business and planning for its future, the owner needs to consider planning not only for the business but for his/her needs as the owner.

Every small business owner should have four plans in place to cover all of these contingencies.

1.    Business Plan – Every business should have a five year plan that addresses the business’ needs for the next five years. This is often called a strategic plan. It enables a business to plan for growth by looking at staffing needs, capital equipment, vendor purchasing, space and location, competition and the business’ response to changes in its particular industry. Many books have been written about business plans and there are strategists available who can help formulate such a plan. Note that all large businesses have such plans.

2.    Contingency Plan – Most small businesses rely on a key person to run the business. This person is usually the owner. If this person is suddenly unavailable through illness or injury, what will happen to the business? How will the business continue to operate? In some instances family members are involved in the business but other times there is no involvement. The small business person must look at employee training and the company’s talent pool and evaluate it. If necessary, strategic hires might be required to make sure the company can continue to run without the owner. Another alternative for a sole proprietor is an agreement with a friendly competitor who is also a sole proprietor. If he/she is unable to work, you will service his/her clients until he/she can get back to work and vice versa. The agreement would include a section that covers the return of clients once the emergency was over.

3.    Exit Plan – Every small business should have a plan for the time when the owner decides he/she wants to leave. This could be for health reasons, personal lifestyle changes or simply to retire. The Exit Plan can include passing the company on to children, selling the company or offering the current employees a chance to take over the ownership of the company. There are many alternative Exit Plan strategies that can be explored. However, thinking about it and setting up a plan will take the uncertainty out of what happens to the company when the owner decides to leave and having a plan will provide peace of mind to the owner’s family.

4.    Estate Plan – This plan goes along with all the others. What happens to the company when the owner dies? How do you protect the equity you have built up in the company and pass it along to your to your family? This plan will allow you to preserve your investment while the other plans are put into action. You can appoint a personal representative that will help continue the business. That person can hire additional help to keep the business going until a decision is made concerning the future of the business. The plan can include a valuation model for the purpose of selling the business if that is necessary. In addition, if a son or daughter is involved in the business, a buyout can be worked out ahead of time to allow for the business to pass to the next generation. There are many alternatives that can and should be explored before the owner decides upon an estate plan.

 I suggest that all business owners explore the above 4 plans and make some decisions to allow for the smooth transition of the business in the event of an unplanned absence, for retirement and to plan for your family upon your death.

This blog is designed for general information purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your own situation. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and utility of the information contained in this blog, no warranty is made, express or implied, and Zimmerman & Steber Legal Group, LLC assumes no liability in connection with any use or result from use of the information contained herein.

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

NLRB Focuses on "At Will" Disclaimers in Employer Documents

By Neil L. Wojtal

The NLRB, through several decisions and based upon remarks made by Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon, will be focusing on at-will disclaimers noting that blanket at-will statements may violate the National Labor Relations Act.

The basis for the possible violation is that a statement signed by an employee which states that the at-will disclaimer cannot be changed under any circumstances has a chilling effect on labor organizing efforts because it leads the employee to believe that the employee's at-will status cannot be changed through collective bargaining.

I am attaching a link to an article which explains the reasoning behind the possible violation and which includes some steps which an employer can take to protect its at-will status. The best protective measure is to make sure your at-will language does not provide that the nature of the at-will relationship cannot be changed under any circumstances.

Here is the link:

http://www.ebglaw.com/showclientadvisory.aspx?Show=16386#page=1


This blog is designed for general information purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your own situation. Although great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and utility of the information contained in this blog, no warranty is made, express or implied, and Zimmerman & Steber Legal Group, LLC assumes no liability in connection with any use or result from use of the information contained herein.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

EEOC Issues Enforcement Guidance for the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

By: Neil L. Wojtal


On April 25, 2012, the EEOC issued new Guidance regarding hiring decisions made by employers based upon arrest and conviction records and how such decisions could violate Title VII.  Title VII protects persons from discrimination based upon race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The EEOC determined that national data supports a finding that criminal record exclusions have a disparate impact based on race and national origin. Therefore, the EEOC has determined that criminal record exclusion policies of an employer could lead to a Title VII disparate impact violation.

The two types of violations are:

1. A violation may occur when an employer treats criminal history information differently for different applicants or employees, based on their race or national origin. This is known as disparate treatment liability.

2. An employer’s neutral policy (e. g. excluding applicants from employment based on certain criminal conduct) may disproportionately impact some individuals protected under Title VII, and may violate the law if not job related and consistent with business necessity. This is known as disparate impact liability.

What can an employer do to make sure that they are in compliance with this Guidance?

§  “Two circumstances in which the Commission believes employers will consistently meet the “job related and consistent with business necessity” defense are as follows:

§  The employer validates the criminal conduct exclusion for the position in question in light of the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (if there is data or analysis about criminal conduct as related to subsequent work performance or behaviors); or

§  The employer develops a targeted screen considering at least the nature of the crime, the time elapsed, and the nature of the job (the three factors identified by the court in Green v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, 549 F.2d 1158 (8th Cir. 1977)). The employer’s policy then provides an opportunity for an individualized assessment for those people identified by the screen, to determine if the policy as applied is job related and consistent with business necessity. (Although Title VII does not require individualized assessment in all circumstances, the use of a screen that does not include individualized assessment is more likely to violate Title VII.).”

Note that compliance with other federal laws and/or regulations that conflict with Title VII is a defense to a charge of discrimination under Title VII. In addition, state and local laws or regulations are preempted by Title VII if they “purport to require or permit the doing of any act which would be an unlawful employment practice” under Title VII U. S. C. Sec. 2000e-7.

How does an employer protect his/ her company from violating Title VII?

The EEOC advises employers to adopt the following best practices:

“VIII. Employer Best Practices

The following are examples of best practices for employers who are considering criminal record information when making employment decisions.

General

·         Eliminate policies or practices that exclude people from employment based on any criminal record.

·         Train managers, hiring officials, and decision makers about Title VII and its prohibition on employment discrimination.

Developing a Policy

·         Develop a narrowly tailored written policy and procedure for screening applicants and employees for criminal conduct.

*   Identify essential job requirements and the actual circumstances under which the jobs are performed.

*   Determine the specific offenses that may demonstrate unfitness for performing such jobs.

§  Identify the criminal offenses based on all available evidence.

*   Determine the duration of exclusions for criminal conduct based on all available evidence.

§  Include an individualized assessment.

*   Record the justification for the policy and procedures.

*   Note and keep a record of consultations and research considered in crafting the policy and procedures.

·         Train managers, hiring officials, and decision makers on how to implement the policy and procedures consistent with Title VII.”

In light of this Guidance, all employers are encouraged to review their policies concerning criminal convictions when hiring new employees or determining the continued employment of current employees.

To view the entire Guidance, go to:


To view frequently asked questions, go to:


To view the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, go to:




The information contained in this document is intended for the sole purpose of providing general legal information and is not intended as legal advice of any kind. This information may not apply to your specific issue, therefore, do not act upon this information without consulting Zimmerman & Steber Legal Group, S. C. or another qualified attorney.